AI Agents for attorney
This is a complete custom agent. We sit with the firm and teach it exactly how that firm works — the workflow, the captioning, when you date a paper, how you e-file — on the case management tools you already use. Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or custom. Not a SaaS login. Not a generic chatbot.
Then the agent runs the matter A to Z: intake, the file, the calendar, the pleading paper, document the file, file it. You keep the license and the judgment. The agent does the computer work of the case.
When you call or text, mention your case management system and how a matter moves in your office.
Watch it open the matter and type the pleading paper
One slice of the A-to-Z loop, on a dummy file: the agent is inside the case, it opens the Martinez matter, it types California pleading paper, it waits for Approve, then it asks to add a signature date and file. Harbor Practice is a simulated case management system. Dummy names. Not a live filing and not legal advice.
Sample clip. Customized to your firm's workflow.
This clip is a sample. The real agent is customized to your firm's workflow and the tools you already use.
Transcript of the demonstration
Harbor Practice opens on Family matters. The agent clicks MARTINEZ v MARTINEZ (26FL-18421, Elena Martinez, San Diego Superior, hearing Sep 18, 2026, Dept. 12). Matter dashboard shows CRM notes still on a pad and the pleading still unfiled. The agent clicks Draft pleading. California 28-line pleading paper fills the view (San Diego caption, packed parenthesis column, left-side caption line). The agent types onto line 20: "I am counsel of record for Petitioner Elena Martinez. The parties exchanged preliminary disclosures and mediated on August 12, 2026. Counsel requests the September 18, 2026 hearing proceed as a case management conference." File / save. A human-review modal: Waiting for your approval. Counsel clicks Approve. The agent asks to add a signature date and file. Signature date is entered. File with the court. Harbor Practice is a simulated case management system.
Dummy matter. Dummy names. Harbor Practice is not a real client. The paper on screen is a demonstration of how the agent works inside a case file, not a live court filing.
A to Z: how the agent runs the case file
Case management is the sequence that turns a phone call into a filed paper and a paper into a file the court and the next hearing can use. We teach the agent that sequence on the firm's existing tools: Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or whatever screens you already live in. We do not rip out your system. We put an agent on it.
A. Intake lands
An email, a web form, a voicemail, or a staff note. The agent reads it, pulls the parties, the court, the case number if there is one, and opens or creates the matter. The attorney is not retyping the contact card.
B. The matter is the source of truth
The agent puts what it knows into the case management record: petitioner, respondent, court, department, next hearing, last consult, what is still on a pad. If the file is missing a field, the agent flags it instead of guessing.
C. Calendar and deadlines
Hearing date, time, and department. Disclosure dates. Records chase. CMC. The agent writes those onto the matter calendar so they are not in someone’s head. When a date is coming, the agent starts the paper for that date.
D. Pleading paper, not a Word dump
This is the real work. The court takes pleading paper: caption, line numbers, parties, case number, date, time, department. The agent types onto that paper — complaints, answers, motions, notices, proofs, case-management statements, declarations, whatever that matter needs next. Same 28-line California sheet you would file by hand.
E. Document the file
A paper that is not in the matter does not exist. The agent saves the pleading into the case file, names it, logs the activity, and leaves a trail a person can audit. The next person on the file can see what was done without hunting a desktop folder.
F. File it
When the paper is ready, the agent runs the firm’s e-file path and files it. You approve first. That is not a gimmick. A bad caption should never leave the office. After Approve, the agent files, confirms what went out, and writes the filing back onto the matter.
G. Update the docket and the next step
Filed. Served. Next hearing. The agent updates the matter so the file matches the court. Then it starts the next paper in the same loop. That is A to Z: the agent does not stop at a draft sitting in Word.
H. Stop when it is a legal call
Whether to take the case, what to argue, what relief to request, what to say in court — that stays with the attorney. The agent runs the file. It does not practice law.
Pleading papers, documented, filed. That is the job.
Firms do not lose the day on strategy. They lose it on the mechanical middle of every matter: get the facts out of email and the pad, put them on court paper, get that paper into the file, get that file to the court. A chatbot that writes a paragraph is not doing the job. An agent taught on your workflow that types the pleading, documents the matter, and files it is doing the job.
Pleading paper
Caption, numbered lines, parties, case number, hearing block. The agent types on the paper the court actually takes, using the matter data already in the file.
Document the file
The PDF lands in the matter. Activity is logged. The next deadline is on the record. Nothing lives only on a pad or a desktop.
File it
After you approve, the agent files through the path the firm already uses and writes the result back to the case. The paper is not done until it is filed.
Why that loop costs the firm real money
Say you run a three-attorney shop. Every open file still needs someone to open the CMS, type the pleading, save it, and file it. That is not one CMC declaration. It is every paper on every matter.
A $400-per-hour attorney who spends 5 hours a week on that A-to-Z computer work is 5 × $400 = $2,000 a week of capacity, about $8,000 a month, sitting in typing and filing instead of hearings, origination, or judgment. A $45-per-hour paralegal on the same loop 10 hours a week is $450 a week of staff time, and the attorney still reviews. Those are worked examples, not a promise. Actual hours depend on the docket. The shape of the cost is the same: the file does not move until a person does the computer work.
What the agent will not do
A to Z means the operational file. It does not mean the agent is the lawyer.
File a bad paper without you
The agent prepares the pleading, documents the file, and files after you approve. If the caption is wrong, you do not approve. Nothing leaves.
Give legal advice or appear in court
No hearings, no negotiating, no deciding what to argue. The attorney keeps the license. The agent keeps the file moving. It does not practice law.
Replace your case management system
The agent is taught on the screens you already use. We do not ask the firm to migrate matters to a new product.
Replace counsel
The agent takes the A-to-Z computer work off the attorney and the paralegal. It does not take the case.
How we build it: customize to your workflow
We start by sitting with the firm. We learn how you actually move a file — your captioning, when you date, who approves, how you e-file — and we teach the agent those steps on the tools you already use. Not a template. Not a SaaS login.
Customize to your workflow
We sit with counsel and staff and learn the real loop for that firm. How you caption. When you date a paper. Who clicks Approve. How you e-file. That becomes the agent's playbook.
Map the A-to-Z loop
Intake to matter to calendar to pleading paper to documenting the file to filing it. We map the screens you already live in. That sequence is what the agent runs.
Teach the agent those screens
Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or a custom file. Same buttons a person clicks. We do not ask you to migrate. The agent is taught on what you already have.
Prove it, then add the next paper
Dummy matter first so you can see the paper and the file. Then live files with you on Approve. Then the next paper type on the same agent. Same loop, more of the docket.
Questions we hear from attorneys
Is this a product we log into?
No. This is a complete custom agent, taught on your firm's workflow and the tools you already use. There is no generic dashboard to subscribe to. We sit with you, build the agent for your screens, then it runs the file.
Does it actually file, or does it only draft?
The job is the paper in the file and the paper at the court. The agent types the pleading, documents the matter, and files after you approve. A draft that never leaves Word is not the work.
Will this work in our case management system?
Yes, because we teach the agent on the screens you already use. Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, or a custom file. We do not require a migration.
What if it files the wrong paper?
It does not file until you approve. If the pleading is wrong, you edit or you reject. After Approve, the agent files and writes the result back to the matter.
Is this worth it for a three-attorney firm?
Small firms feel the A-to-Z loop more, because there is no back office to absorb it. If counsel is still the person typing and filing, that is the hours to get back. We start with one matter type so you can see the file move before we add the next.
How do we start?
Call or text 949-205-7333, or use the contact page. We sit with you, map how a matter actually moves in your office, and teach the agent that path — intake to pleading to file.
Related resources
Contact Pro Logica
Start a conversation about an agent taught on your case files.
AI agents
How Pro Logica builds agents that use the computer and pause for a human.
AI Systems and Automation
Broader agent and automation work for professional firms.
Legal and Compliance
Other work with legal and compliance teams.
Taught on your workflow
Sit with us. We will teach the agent how your firm files.
Call or text 949-205-7333. Tell us which case management system you run and how a matter moves in your office. We will map that loop and put a custom agent on it.